Watch two astronauts swap out batteries on the outside of the space station today

This morning, NASA astronauts Peggy Whitson and Shane Kimbrough will take a stroll outside of the International Space Station to help upgrade the orbiting lab’s power systems. Specifically, the duo are going to help swap out the old nickel-hydrogen batteries the ISS has been using with new, more efficient lithium-ion batteries. The duo are veterans of venturing out into space, as today’s journey will mark Kimbrough’s third spacewalk and Whitson’s seventh. Their trip also will be the first of two spacewalks this month to install the batteries on the ISS.

Fortunately for the two astronauts, a lot of the preparation for this battery swap has already been done. Six lithium-ion batteries and six adaptor plates were launched to the station at the end of last year on a Japanese HTV cargo vehicle. NASA likes the new lithium-ion batteries because they have lighter mass, making them easier to get to orbit, and they’re supposed to last much longer than the older batteries. So one battery and one plate will be used to replace one pair of the old nickel-hydrogen batteries near the station’s solar panels. A data-link cable will connect each adapter plate and battery pair, and the plates will also be used to store some of the old batteries that won’t be used anymore.

Additionally, everything is more or less in position for today’s walk. On New Year’s Eve, teams on the ground remotely controlled Canada’s robotic arm and a robot called Dextre, moving many of the old nickel-hydrogen batteries out of the way and getting the new lithium-ion ones in the right spot for installation. These robotic operations were meant to help cut down considerably on the number of spacewalks needed to perform the full battery operation. “When we go outside, [spacewalks] are one of the most dangerous things we do as a program,” Kenneth Todd, the ISS Operations Manager, said at a press conference. “So any time we can use station assets that are not the crew to go do a task, then that’s certainly something we want to endeavor to do.”

The ground crew used Dextre to remove the new batteries from a storage pallet that was carried to the station in the HTV cargo spacecraft. That same pallet will be used to store some of the old nickel-hydrogen batteries, too. Eventually the pallet along with nine old batteries will be destroyed when the HTV cargo vehicle leaves the station and burns up in Earth’s atmosphere.

Today, Whitson and Kimbrough’s jobs are mostly to install the new batteries and plates by bolting them down and attaching the data cables. They’ll also store some of the old nickel-hydrogen batteries on top of the new adaptor plates. The entire operation should take about 6.5 hours, the standard duration for spacewalks. Once they’re finished, it’ll be time to prep for next week’s trip, in which Kimbrough and French astronaut Thomas Pesquet will complete the rest of the battery installation.

But once that’s over, the full battery swap on the ISS isn’t truly done

But once that’s over, the full battery swap on the ISS isn’t truly done. The station’s eight power channels each use three strings of batteries, and each string has a pair of nickel-hydrogen batteries. So this months’ installation is only replacing a fraction of the full battery supply. NASA still has a few more sets of lithium-ion batteries and adaptor plates it needs to send up to the station for replacement. It’s a process that’s going to take a couple of years, with the next set of batteries slated to be installed later this year.

Things get underway this morning when Whitson and Kimbrough exit the station around 7:10AM ET. You can watch the entire spacewalk on NASA TV, embedded above.

The First iPad For The Blind #tactile

This is pretty cool, an iPad for the blind. It’s been a long time since there’s been innovation in this space. The company is competing at CES 2017 in Vegas.
BLITAB is the World’s first tactile tablet for blind and visually impaired people. BLITAB is a next curve Braille device for Braille reading and writing that displays one whole page Braille text at once, without any mechanical elements. It is like an e-book which instead of using a screen displays small physical bubbles. For the first time our users can have an overview of a whole document. The new developed technology used in the BLITAB tablet provides an opportunity for an affordable, 100x better solution, disrupting a market that has no innovations in the last 40 years.

Americans eat 554 million Jack in the Box tacos a year, and no one knows why

More than 1,000 times a minute, someone bites into what has been described as a wet envelope of cat food—and keeps eating.

Jack in the Box is known to most of the country for its hamburgers and bigheaded mascot. But for many of its devotees, the magic of the fast-food chain lies in its interpretation of a taco.

A tortilla wrapped around a beef filling that is dunked in a fryer and topped with American cheese, lettuce and hot sauce, the taco appeared on the menu in the 1950s after the first Jack in the Box opened in San Diego. As the chain spread beyond California, the taco has followed it —with good reason. Jack in the Box now sells more tacos than any other item on its menu thanks to a legion of fans who swear by the greasy vessels even as they sometimes struggle to understand their appeal.

CONTROVERSIAL MCDONALD’S OPENS IN VATICAN CITY AMID CARDINAL PROTESTS

The first time Heather Johnson tasted a Jack in the Box taco, she was at a drive-through in Cincinnati when she noticed you could get two for 99 cents, so she added them to her burger order.

She took two bites, threw the rest on the passenger seat and kept driving. “It was stale, greasy, spicy, crunchy, saucy and just plain strange,” said Ms. Johnson, a 43-year-old director of operations at an advertising agency in Cincinnati and author of a blog called the Food Hussy. “Who puts a slice of American cheese in a taco?”

Two minutes later, she picked the taco off the seat and finished it. Then she ate the other one.

“I was like,”I must have more. This is vile and amazing,'” she said.

Mike Primavera believes when it comes to Jack in the Box tacos, there are two kinds of people: those who think they’re disgusting and those who agree they’re disgusting but are powerless to resist them.

He first tried one about 10 years ago when he stopped at a Jack in the Box on his way home from a bar. “I remember pulling it out of the sleeve, and even though I was drunk I was like,”I shouldn’t eat this.’ But damn it was good,” said Mr. Primavera, an equipment manager for a general contractor in Seattle. “I’ve been addicted to them ever since.”

Mr. Primavera, who made the cat food comment on Twitter, said the secret to the tacos’ goodness may be the juxtaposition of the “soggy, nasty middle” and the “rim of crunchiness on the outside” that comes from deep-frying the tortilla with the beef filling already inside. One key, he said: “You can’t look at it too long before you eat it. You just kind of have to get it outside of the sleeve and into your mouth.”

FOR THE LATEST FOOD FEATURES FOLLOW FOX LIFESTYLE ON FACEBOOK 

Every Jack in the Box taco is born at one of three plants in Texas and Kansas, where tortillas made from stone-ground white corn are cut, cooked and filled with the beef mixture. They are shrink-wrapped and frozen and eventually shipped to stores to be fried, topped and served in taco-sized bags. The company sells 554 million tacos a year, or about 1,055 a minute.

That is about the same number of Big Macs McDonald’s says it sold in the U.S. in 2007, the last time it says it tracked that figure.

This article originally ran in The Wall Street Journal.

The Guy On the Left Must Not Have a Skeleton

I’m thinking that these guys just realized they are in the Matrix and that they can move in slow motion and dodge bullets. Either that or they’ve got two cameras going here. One that is recording them that they speed up and slow down, and another on the crowd that they keep playing at normal speed.
That, or these guys are just amazing poppers. 

Renewing Medium’s focus

We’ve decided to make some major changes at Medium.

I’ll start with the hard part: As of today, we are reducing our team by about one third — eliminating 50 jobs, mostly in sales, support, and other business functions. We are also changing our business model to more directly drive the mission we set out on originally.

Obviously, this is a tough thing to do, made tougher by the immense respect and love we have for these people who have helped make Medium what it is today. We reached this decision when Medium’s management team came together to review the last year and take a hard look at our business — where we are and where we’re headed. While we could continue on our current path — and there is a business case for doing so — we decided that we risk failing on our larger, original mission if we don’t make some proactive changes while we have the momentum and resources to do so.

In terms of momentum, 2016 was our best year yet. Key metrics, such as readers and published posts were up approximately 300% year on year. And we witnessed important stories published on Medium — from world-famous leaders to unknown individuals — on a daily basis. We’re proud of Medium’s role in promoting intelligent viewpoints and new ideas no matter who they’re from, becoming the default outlet for thoughtful people who have something to say about the world.

In other ways, however, we feel we’re falling short.

Our vision, when we started in 2012, was ambitious: To build a platform that defined a new model for media on the internet. The problem, as we saw it, was that the incentives driving the creation and spread of content were not serving the people consuming it or creating it — or society as a whole. As I wrote at the time, “The current system causes increasing amounts of misinformation…and pressure to put out more content more cheaply — depth, originality, or quality be damned. It’s unsustainable and unsatisfying for producers and consumers alike….We need a new model.

We set out to build a better publishing platform — one that allowed anyone to offer their stories and ideas to the world and that helped the great ones rise to the top. In 2016, we made big investments in teams and technology aimed at attracting and migrating commercial publishers to Medium. And in order to get these publishers paid, we built out and started selling our first ad products. This strategy worked in terms of driving growth, as well as improving the volume and consistency of great content. Some of the web’s best publishers are now on Medium, and we’re happy to work with them every day. We also saw interest from many big brands and promising results from several content marketing campaigns on the platform.

However, in building out this model, we realized we didn’t yet have the right solution to the big question of driving payment for quality content. We had started scaling up the teams to sell and support products that were, at best, incremental improvements on the ad-driven publishing model, not the transformative model we were aiming for.

To continue on this trajectory put us at risk — even if we were successful, business-wise — of becoming an extension of a broken system.

Upon further reflection, it’s clear that the broken system is ad-driven media on the internet. It simply doesn’t serve people. In fact, it’s not designed to. The vast majority of articles, videos, and other “content” we all consume on a daily basis is paid for — directly or indirectly — by corporations who are funding it in order to advance their goals. And it is measured, amplified, and rewarded based on its ability to do that. Period. As a result, we get…well, what we get. And it’s getting worse.

That’s a big part of why we are making this change today.

We decided we needed to take a different — and bolder — approach to this problem. We believe people who write and share ideas should be rewarded on their ability to enlighten and inform, not simply their ability to attract a few seconds of attention. We believe there are millions of thinking people who want to deepen their understanding of the world and are dissatisfied with what they get from traditional news and their social feeds. We believe that a better system — one that serves people — is possible. In fact, it’s imperative.

So, we are shifting our resources and attention to defining a new model for writers and creators to be rewarded, based on the value they’re creating for people. And toward building a transformational product for curious humans who want to get smarter about the world every day.

It is too soon to say exactly what this will look like. This strategy is more focused but also less proven. It will require time to get it right, as well as some different skills. Which is why we are taking these steps today and saying goodbye to many talented people. To stay efficient, we are shutting our offices in New York and Washington D.C. (though some people will continue to work remotely from those locales). And we will be parting ways with some of our executives who were brought on to scale these teams. The vast majority of the product development and engineering teams will remain, both to support the Medium you love and to bring it to the next level.

This is certainly one of the hardest things I’ve done in my years as a founder and CEO. I want to sincerely thank my management team who has helped think through and implement this process with great care. And, of course, all the team members to whom we are saying goodbye. I’m really proud of the people who have chosen to join Medium over the years and of the culture we’ve built. The quality and success of the Medium platform is due to their efforts. I also want to mention Medium’s board and investors, the best I’ve ever worked with, who have been incredibly supportive and helpful throughout.

We know the path ahead will not be easy. But we are excited about our challenge. Thank you for your support of Medium. Look for even more great stories and important ideas in the year ahead.

This article originally appeared at: https://blog.medium.com/renewing-mediums-focus-98f374a960be#.qkon0homp.

Transcript of Simon Sinek Millennials in the Workplace Interview

This is a transcript of an interview with Simon Sinek about his take on millennials in the workplace recorded in Dec of 2016. I thought it was meaningful and decided to type out the interview for my blog. If you have any opinions on what Simon summarizes, please leave me a comment below. I would appreciate hearing if you agree or disagree with his take.
I too believe millennials are a remarkable generation and smarter than any other before them. In my life, I am learning more from millennials than anyone. Having grown up with such access to information, those who choose to use it wisely are the most brilliant people I know. I like to surround myself with smart people so that I am learning constantly and there’s an awareness, an instinct that millennials possess that just can’t be taught. They sniff out anything that is fake and have a passion for purity. I sympathize with the conclusions on the lack of self-confidence in millennials that Simon addresses though. I hope to be a better leader so that I can help with this. Millennials really do have the ability to resolve many of the world’s issues if we support and understand them better.
Key point to note. Simon stresses that the youth should reduce their exposure to technology, specifically cellphones. Many of the elite in tech such as Steve Jobs and Evan Williams never allowed their children to use iPads or cellphones knowing full well what the negative mental outcomes would be from constant usage. They were well aware of the correlation of addiction with technology and the dopamine cellphones release in our brains. That awareness was part of their climb to such global success.
Here’s the interview.

Apparently, millennials as a group of people, which are those born from approximately 1984 and after, are tough to manage. They are accused of being entitled and narcissistic, self interested, unfocused and lazy – but entitled is the big one. 

Because they confound the leadership so much, leaders will say “what do you want?” And millennials will say “we want to work in a place with purpose, we want to make an impact, we want free food and bean bag chairs.” Any yet when provided all these things they are still not happy. And that is because there is a missing piece.

It can be broken down into 4 pieces actually. 1 Parenting. 2 Technology. 3 Impatience. 4 Environment.

The generation that is called the millennials, too many of them grew up subject to “failed parenting strategies.” Where they were told that they were special – all the time, they were told they can have anything they want in life, just because they want it. Some of them got into honors classes not because they deserved it but because their parents complained. Some of them got A’s not because they earned them, but because the teachers didn’t want to deal with the parents. Some kids got participation medals, they got a medal for coming in last. Which the science we know is pretty clear is that it devalues the medal and the reward for those who actually work hard and that actually makes the person who comes in last embarrassed because they know they didn’t deserve it so that actually makes them feel worse.

You take this group of people and they graduate and they get a job and they’re thrust into the real world and in an instant they find out they are not special, their mom’s can’t get them a promotion, that you get nothing for coming in last and by the way you can’t just have it because you want it. In an instant their entire self image is shattered. So we have an entire generation that is growing up with lower self esteem than previous generations.

 The other problem to compound it is we are growing up in a Facebook/Instagram world, in other words, we are good at putting filters on things. We’re good at showing people that life is amazing even though I am depressed…

Everybody sounds tough, and everybody sounds like they have it all figured out and the reality is there’s very little toughness and most people don’t have it all figured out. So when the more senior people say “well, what should we do?” they sound like “this is what you gotta do!” – but they have no clue.

So you have an entire generation growing up with lower self esteem than previous generations – through no fault of their own, they were dealt a bad hand. Now let’s add in technology. We know that engagement with social media and our cell phones releases a chemical called dopamine. That’s why when you get a text – it feels good. In a 2012 study, Harvard research scientists reported that talking about oneself through social media activates a pleasure sensation in the brain usually associated with food, money and sex. It’s why we count the likes, it’s why we go back ten times to see if the interaction is growing, and if our Instagram is slowing we wonder if we have done something wrong, or if people don’t like us anymore. The trauma for young kids to be unfriended it too much to handle. We know when you get the attention it feels good, you get a hit of dopamine which feels good which is why we keep going back to it. Dopamine is the exact same chemical that makes us feel good when we smoke, when we drink and when we gamble. In other words, it’s highly, highly addictive…

We have age restrictions on smoking, drinking and gambling but we have no age restrictions on social media and cell phones. Which is the equivalent of opening up the liquor cabinet and saying to our teenagers “hey by the way, if this adolescence thing gets you down – help yourself.”

An entire generation now has access to an addictive, numbing chemical called dopamine, through cellphones and social media, while they are going through the high stress of adolescence. 

Why is this important? Almost every alcoholic discovered alcohol when they were teenagers. When we are very, very young the only approval we need is the approval of our parents and as we go through adolescence we make this transition where we now need the approval of our peers. Very frustrating for our parents, very important for the teenager. It allows us to acculturate outside of our immediate families and into the broader tribe. It’s a highly, highly stressful and anxious period of our lives and we are supposed to learn to rely on our friends.  

Some people, quite by accident, discover alcohol, the numbing effects of dopamine, to help them cope with the stresses and anxieties of adolescence. Unfortunately that becomes hard wired in their brains and for the rest of their lives, when they suffer significant stress, they will not turn to a person, they will turn to the bottle. Social stress, financial stress, career stress, that’s pretty much the primary reasons why an alcoholic drinks. But now because we are allowing unfettered access to these devices and media, basically it is becoming hard wired and what we are seeing is that they grow older, too many kids don’t know how to form deep, meaningful relationships. “Their words, not mine.”

They will admit that many of their relationships are superficial, they will admit that they don’t count on their friends, they don’t rely on their friends. They have fun with their friends, but they also know that their friends will cancel on them when something better comes along. Deep meaningful relationships are not there because they never practiced the skillset and worse, they don’t have the coping mechanisms to deal with stress. So when significant stress begins to show up in their lives, they’re not turning to a person, they’re turning to a device, they’re turning to social media, they’re turning to these things which offer temporary relief. 

We know, the science is clear, we know that people who spend more time on Facebook suffer higher rates of depression than people who spend less time on Facebook.

These things balanced, are not bad. Alcohol is not bad, too much alcohol is bad. Gambling is fun, too much gambling is dangerous. There is nothing wrong with social media and cellphones, it’s the imbalance.

If you are sitting at dinner with your friends, and you are texting somebody who is not there – that’s a problem. That’s an addiction. If you are sitting in a meeting with people you are supposed to be listening and speaking to, and you put your phone on the table, that sends a subconscious message to the room “you’re just not that important.” The fact that you can’t put the phone away, that’s because you are addicted. 

If you wake up and you check your phone before you say good morning to your girlfriend, boyfriend or spouse, you have an addiction. And like all addictions, in time, it will destroy relationships, it will cost time, it will cost money and it will make your life worse.

So we have a generation growing up with lower self-esteem that doesn’t have the coping mechanisms to deal with stress and now you add in the sense of impatience. They’ve grown up in a world of instant gratification. You want to buy something, you go on Amazon and it arrives the next day. You want to watch a movie, logon and watch a movie. You don’t check movie times. You want to watch a TV show, binge. You don’t even have to wait week-to-week-to-week. Many people skip seasons, just so they can binge at the end of the season…

Instant gratification. You want to go on a date? You don’t even have to learn how to be socially awkward on that first date. You don’t need to learn how to practice that skill. You don’t have to be the uncomfortable person who says yes when you mean no and no when you mean yes. Swipe right – bang – done! You don’t even need to learn the social coping mechanism.

Everything you want you can have instantaneously. Everything you want, instant gratification, except, job satisfaction and strength of relationships – their ain’t no out for that. They are slow, meandering, uncomfortable, messy processes. 

And so millennials are wonderful, idealistic, hardworking smart kids who’ve just graduated school and are in their entry-level jobs and when asked “how’s it going?” they say “I think I’m going to quit.” And we’re like “why?” and they say “I’m not making an impact.” To which we say – “you’ve only been there eight months…” 

It’s as if their standing at the foot of a mountain and they have this abstract concept called impact that they want to have on the world, which is the summit. What they don’t see is the mountain. I don’t care if you go up the mountain quickly or slowly, but there’s still a mountain. And so what this young generation needs to learn is patience. That some things that really, really matter, like love or job fulfillment, joy, love of life, self confidence, a skillset, any of these things, all of these things take time. Sometimes you can expedite pieces of it, but the overall journey is arduous and long and difficult and if you don’t ask for help and learn that skillset, you will fall off the mountain. Or the worst case scenario, we’re seeing an increase in suicide rates in this generation, we’re seeing an increase in accidental deaths due to drug overdoses, we’re seeing more and more kids drop out of school or take a leave of absence due to depression. Unheard of. This is really bad.

The best case scenario, you’ll have an entire population growing up and going through life and just never really finding joy. They’ll never really find deep, deep fulfillment in work or in life, they’ll just waft through life and it things will only be “just fine.” “How’s your job?” “It’s fine, same as yesterday…” “How’s your relationship?” “It’s fine…”

That’s the best case scenario.  

Which leads to the fourth point which is environment. Which is we’re taking this amazing group of young, fantastic kids who were just dealt a bad hand and it’s no fault of their own, and we put them in corporate environments that care more about the numbers than they do about the kids. They care more about the short-term gains than the life of this young human being. We care more about the year than the lifetime. We are putting them in corporate environments that are not helping them build their confidence. That aren’t helping them learn the skills of cooperation. That aren’t helping them overcome the challenges of a digital world and finding more balance. That isn’t helping them overcome the need for instant gratification and teach them the joys and impact and the fulfillment you get from working hard on something for a long time that cannot be done in a month or even in a year.

So we thrust them into corporate environments and the worst thing is they think it’s them. They blame themselves. They think it’s them who can’t deal. And so it makes it all worse. It’s not them. It’s the corporations, it’s the corporate environment, it’s the total lack of good leadership in our world today that is making them feel the way they do. They were dealt a bad hand and it’s the company’s responsibility to pick up the slack and work extra hard and find ways to build their confidence, to teach them the social skills that their missing out on. 

There should be no cellphones in conference rooms. None, zero. When sitting and waiting for a meeting to start, instead of using your phone with your head down, everyone should be focused on building relationships. We ask personal questions, “How’s your dad? I heard he was in the hospital.” “Oh he’s really good thanks for asking. He’s actually at home now.” “Oh I’m glad to hear that.” “That was really amazing.” “I know, it was really scary for a while there.” — That’s how you form relationships. “Hey did you ever get that report done?” “No, I totally forgot.” “Hey, I can help you out. Let me help you.” “Really?” — That’s how trust forms. Trust doesn’t form at an event in a day. Even bad times don’t form trust immediately. It’s the slow, steady consistency and we need to create mechanisms where we allow for those little innocuous interactions to happen. 

When we are out with friends, as we are leaving for dinner together, we leave our cell phones at home. Who are we calling? Maybe one of us will bring a phone in case we need to call an Uber. It’s like an alcoholic. The reason you take the alcohol out of the house is because we cannot trust our willpower. We’re just not strong enough. But when you remove the temptation, it actually makes it a lot easier. When you just say “Don’t check your phone,” people will just go to the bathroom and what’s the first thing we do? We look at the phone.

When you don’t have the phone, you just check out the world. And that’s where ideas happen. The constant, constant, constant engagement is not where you have innovation and ideas. Ideas happen when our minds wander and we see something and we think, “I bet they could do that…” That’s called innovation. But we’re taking away all those little moments. 

None of us should charge our phones by our beds. We should be charging our phones in the living rooms. Remove the temptation. We wake up in the middle of the night because you can’t sleep, you won’t check your phone, which makes it worse. But if it’s in the living room, it’s relaxed, it’s fine. Some say “but it’s my alarm clock.” Buy an alarm clock. They cost eight dollars.

The point is, we now in industry, whether we like it or not, we don’t get a choice, we now have a responsibility to make up the shortfall. And help this amazing, idealistic, fantastic generation build their confidence, learn patience, learn the social skills, find a better balance between life and technology because quite frankly it’s the right thing to do.

You can find more about Simon Sinek and his books at his site www.startwithwhy.com

Faraday Future Introduces Its Would-Be Tesla Killer, the FF91

It’s been a rough year for erstwhile electric car company Faraday Future. Several members of a senior staff recruited from the likes of Tesla, BMW, and Google, as well as the aerospace and medical device sectors, reportedly jumped ship. The company fell behind in paying the contractor building its factory in Nevada, where state treasurer Dan Schwartz called Faraday Future a Ponzi scheme. Its funding comes from the founder of the Chinese tech giant LeEco, which is building an electric car you could call a rival.

A Faraday Future spokesperson says that, as a private company, it does not discuss its finances, and the next stage of the factory is slated for construction soon.

So perhaps it’s no surprise that the company has been on a major publicity blitz, desperate to convince people that its car isn’t vaporware. It teased videos of a camouflaged car outracing a top-of-the-line Tesla Model X, a Bentley Bentyaga, and a Ferrari 488GTB. Impressive.

And tonight at CES 2017 in Las Vegas, Faraday Future pulled the sheet off an all-new, tech-tastic, Tesla-eating, electric car. The rough luck continued though, when the car failed to perform quite as planned during its on-stage demo. The FF91 looks like a squashed station wagon in the front, and a party at a baroque church at the back. Long, low, and wide, it definitely has more personality than the more businesslike Model X—offering limo-like dimensions and comfort, a soft and rounded exterior, and swooped up winglets in the name of aerodynamic efficiency. Inside you’ll find fully reclining seats and flat surfaces that double as touchscreens or light displays.

“We are about extreme technology,” says Nick Sampson, senior VP of engineering and R&D. “Our lives have become very digital and connected, but our cars have not, as yet.”

The FF91 looks nothing like the bizarre single-seater Batmobile that the company showed last year at CES. That’s a good thing. Faraday Future promises a high-end but practical electric vehicle that can beat Tesla at its own game, and the FF91 is much closer to that goal—an ultra-luxury passenger vehicle with all sorts of gadgetry.

Another similarity with Tesla: Faraday Future is accepting reservations, even though the FF91 doesn’t really exist yet. Just $5,000 will secure your place in line, but unlike the relatively affordable $35,000 Tesla Model 3, Faraday Future hasn’t announced a price. It won’t be cheap, assuming the company comes through on its promise to actually build these things. It says its benchmark is the value of a Bentley.

After a demonstration ride in a pre-production vehicle, driven by a chassis engineer around an empty parking lot near the company’s Los Angeles HQ, I can confirm that the FF91 is neck-snappingly fast, and takes tight turns without much fuss. The official 0-60 time is 2.39 seconds. A 130 kilowatt-hour battery (30 percent larger than Tesla’s biggest) should deliver a range of 378 miles. The loooong wheelbase should mean it turns like a bus, but active rear steering means makes it sashay through a perimeter of cones that a Tesla Model X plows right over.

But there’s a big difference between building 12 demo models (the current production output) and building at scale. As they say in the auto biz, anyone can build one. “From a prototype to a vehicle that will conform legally, there’s an enormous amount of work and investment needed,” says John Fleming, who advises SME (previously the Society of Manufacturing Engineers), and who worked at Ford for 48 years. “Tesla is on the leading edge of this disruptive influence, but even they’re struggling to really get the volumes they expect.”

The Faraday Future team has worked hard on some cool ideas for the future of motoring, and it would be a shame if they don’t make it to production. The hood of the FF91 has a pop-up LIDAR sensor, which provides basic self-driving capabilities, including a “robot valet” function where the car finds its own parking space. The company tried to demonstrate that function to the crowd at CES, but it refused to move.

Cameras in the B-pillars—the uprights just behind the front doors—recognize approaching passengers, and open the suicide rear doors (a cool way of saying they open on rear-mounted hinges for easier access and, frankly, badass looks). Perhaps less usefully, the car will recognize your mood from facial expressions and adjust the music, seat massager, and even aromatherapy scents to suit your demeanor.

An array of lights integrated into the doors and the front and back of the car can communicate with the outside world, letting other road users know when the computer is in charge, for example, or whether a vehicle is available for ride sharing.

The interior has what the company is calling zero-g seats in the back, which recline and lift passengers’ legs. A screen folds down from the roof for a cinema-like experience. These features may be welcome in a fully autonomous car, but in the shorter term, rear seat luxury also sells well in China where the wealthy have drivers.

If you believe Faraday Future, the company will start building the cars at scale in 2018. That seems optimistic. If you drop that $5000 on a deposit, be prepared for a long wait.

This article originally appeared at: https://www.wired.com/2017/01/farraday-futures-tesla-beater-debut-doesnt-go-quite-planned-aw/.

Bill and Melinda Gates back an implant that could prevent HIV

You don’t have to wait until after an infection to fight HIV. A technique known as pre-exposure prophylaxis has you taking preemptive medicine on a regular basis, greatly reducing the chances that HIV will take root in the first place. Needless to say, such a treatment could change the world if done well — and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation wants to make sure that it’s as easy as possible. They’re investing $140 million in an Intarcia Therapeutics program that will develop an under-the-skin pump implant (you’re looking at it above) that will deliver a steady stream of anti-HIV drugs in 6- or 12-month batches. Instead of having to remember to take medicine every day, you’d only have to top up once or twice a year.

There’s also a variant of the pump targeted at type 2 diabetes. Intarcia started the paperwork on commercial use in November, so you could see it in use relatively soon.

Any practical implementation of the HIV pump is years away. Intarcia still has to settle on a drug to use, and there are regulations and similar hurdles to clear before it’s ready to use. If it’s deployed as promised, though, it could go a long way toward reducing the influence of HIV and AIDS in places like sub-Saharan Africa, where the virus remains a serious problem. Like with many medicines, the biggest challenge is simply getting people to take preventative drugs on a consistent basis — this would make it much less of a hassle. Cost is still a concern (will the medicine be inexpensive enough that wide distribution is practical?), but the technology is at least in place.